What's Happening Now

Calls for NOW to condemn misogynist attack against S.E. Cupp fall on deaf ears; Women need NOW like fish need bicycles

http://twitter.com/#!/OHenrysStepchld/status/205317927308767234

Exactly. NOW is worthless.

Twitchy reported on the disgusting systematic misogyny perpetrated against S.E. Cupp earlier today. This is standard operating procedure for the Left, who consistently dehumanize and sexualize conservative women in an attempt to marginalize them and shut them up.

But, good news! NOW totally responded to the misogyny against S.E. Cupp. Ha! Just kidding! They are far too busy protesting Rush Limbaugh.

Enough Rush Campaign
Rush Limbaugh has spread his hate for far too long! Bullying is no longer profitable.

Bullying. That’s rich. They are also tied up with all the lying about a mythical wage gap anyway.

The pay gap costs women an average of $434,000 over their career. Women deserve #EqualPay for equal work.

— National NOW (@NationalNOW) May 22, 2012

That didn’t stop conservatives on Twitter from asking for condemnation from NOW and other “women’s groups.”

I'm sure @NationalNOW will come out and condemn Flynt's photoshop of @secupp. http://t.co/3vCYOkMC #not #IStandWithSECupp

— TreBob (@2TreBob) May 23, 2012

Repulsive is not a strong enough word to describe the attack on SE CUPP. Any so called pro women organizations should condemn Hustler.

— Justen Charters (@JustenCharters) May 23, 2012

Because they're hypocrites? MT @gopfirecracker I'd really like 2 know why @NationalNOW hasn't said anything about S.E. Cupp incident yet.

— Saxon's Wrath (@DesertWillow56) May 23, 2012

#IStandWithSECupp (Still waiting on feminist groups to join us- @NationalNOW @NARAL)

— Andrew Bair (@ProLifePolitics) May 23, 2012

Will #NationalNow #StandwithSE? If not why not?

— Locke Step (@Lockestep1776) May 23, 2012

The tweets asking for NOW’s condemnation are endless. And are unnecessary. Look, women need NOW like a fish needs a bicycle.

I'm just trying to keep @NationalNOW consistent. Speak up for @secupp! #IStandWithSECupp

— Mary Chastain (@mchastain81) May 23, 2012

Hey, if NOW were ever consistent, they would have endorsed Rush Limbaugh.

Does @NationalNOW stand up and defend ALL women, or just liberal women? #istandwithsecupp

— Lilia (@LiliaEP) May 23, 2012

They don’t stand for any women, really. They serve an agenda only. They are useful idiots for a Leftist agenda and nothing else. Once, they gave a faux condemnation of some of Pig Maher’s comments regarding Sarah Palin. But, in the end, they placed the blame on her. Pesky little woman!

She has come a long way, baby. It’s far past time that we all do. The first step is hammering the final nail in NOW’s coffin (violent rhetoric be damned!) They should be marginalized as the group full of useful idiots that they are.

They again gave a lame denouncement of  a revolting Gawker piece about Chrisine O’Donnell. It was so vile, they were shamed into condemning it; but did they really? Nope. It was insincere and back-handed.

There were no good intentions on the part of NOW; there were only self-serving intentions aimed at covering their own behinds. Yet, conservatives were expected to “give credit where due” because NOW half-assedly condemned a vile attack on a conservative women, all while they peppered their “condemnation” with criticism of Ms. O’Donnell. We were to pat them on their smugs backs for being all “this is bad, even though we hate this cuckoo pants broad. Talking about her girly bits is creepy, even though she is totally creepy herself. And cuckoo. And we hate her. Aren’t we totally fair and For The Women-y?”

@NationalNOW If you don't stand for ALL women, you don't stand for ANY of us. For shame. @secupp

— Regular Mid-West Gal (@Kathleen_Foster) May 23, 2012

They do not stand for any women. It is true that groups like NOW hold conservative women in particular contempt. They make that quite clear and they unabashedly do not hide that fact. Still, they aren’t really for any woman. Every belief that groups like NOW espouse, every agenda they embrace and every policy that they push to further that agenda is harmful to all women. It is even harmful to the women who continue to walk in lockstep with Stepford feminists like them.

NOW (and NARAL and their ilk) do not speak for women. Nor should they. Ever.

They are not, nor should they be, looked to as an authority on anything at all, and especially not women.

If @NationalNOW does not speak up to condemn the actions against Nikki Haley and SE Cupp then you are a useless organization.

— Strategic Grandma (@CoFemale) May 23, 2012

They are useless. And their For The Woman ™ card expired long ago; it is now time to confiscate it and cut it up into little pieces. REJECTED.

It is extremely harmful to women to continue to give them credence, when absolutely none is deserved. Such credence is given by expecting – and sometimes demanding – that they issue statements. Who the heck wants them to? It’s insulting.

Women don’t need the likes of NOW “defending” them. Conservative women are always grossly and falsely accused of “playing the victim.” The reason given is that they stand up for themselves, fight back and issue their own statements in lieu of waiting for others to do so. Damned if they do, damned if they don’t. But, see, that is the opposite of victimhood. They do not rely on the likes of NOW or other faux women’s groups to “defend” them.

@NationalNOW Lets go NOW. Show some outrage over the treatment of SE Cupp

— John Williams (@johnwpe) May 23, 2012

No, thanks. Want to come a long way, baby? Realize that women need feminists like a fish needs a bicycle. Hammer that final nail in NOW’s coffin (violent rhetoric be damned!) And refuse to give credence to anti-woman groups. No one should care what they say. Plus, it only serves to embolden them and further the lie that they speak for women. They don’t. They speak for the Left. And this is the Left:

For the record: Fuck S.E. Cupp.

— Nick Downton (@M4G3RK) May 23, 2012

Remember that, women. Do you really want NOW, useful idiots for that Left, to speak for you?

We stand with Haley and we stand with Cupp instead.

UPDATE:

Planned Parenthood and Sandra “Tool” Fluke weigh in.

.@HustlerMag depiction of @secupp so offensive. Sexualization of female public figs attempts 2 limit them 2 being sexual figures & not more.

— Sandra Fluke (@SandraFluke) May 23, 2012

Sexist attacks made against women like @SandraFluke and recently @secupp are disgraceful and cannot be tolerated http://t.co/8Vcn0AzZ

— Planned Parenthood (@PPact) May 23, 2012

Note that Planned Parenthood equates the two, as if there is any comparison. This is just another attempt to cover their own behinds and to appear “fair” and “above it all.” It’s so they can say “see? We are totally for the women, even the icky, non-authentic ones.”

They aren’t. They are for an agenda only. Don’t fall for it.

 

Related: Weaponized misogyny: Hustler punishes S.E. Cupp for pro-life views with explicit fake image

Read more: http://twitchy.com/2012/05/23/calls-for-now-to-condemn-misogynist-attack-against-se-cupp-fall-on-deaf-ears-women-need-now-like-fish-need-bicycles/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *